- ARHT Media Inc. (TSX.V:ART)0.215+0.015 +7.500%
- Canopy Growth Corp. (TSX.V:CGC)2.77-0.05 -1.77%
- Lingo Media Corp. (TSX.V:LM)0.67-0.01 -1.47%
- Avigilon Corp (TSX:AVO)12.87-0.22 -1.68%
- Omni-Lite Industries Canada Inc. (TSX.V:OML)1.70+0.00 +0.00%
- Nobilis Health Corp (TSX:NHC)3.47+0.02 +0.58%
- DealNet Capital Corp (TSX.V:DLS)0.87+0.00 +0.00%
- TIO Networks Corp (TSX.V:TNC)1.81-0.01 -0.55%
- Snipp Interactive Inc. (TSX.V:SPN)
- AcuityAds Holdings Inc. (TSX.V:AT)0.94+0.03 +3.30%
- Concordia Healthcare Corp. (TSX:CXR)51.01-0.39 -0.76%
- Grenville Strategic Royalty Corp (TSX.V:GRC)0.76+0.01 +1.33%
Don’t Get Too Excited about the U.S. Probe of Gold Price Manipulation
Yesterday, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the regulator who ostensibly regulates the banks and major financial institutions who participate in the futures and commodities trading business, announced they were going to examine whether prices are being manipulated in the “world’s largest gold market”, according to a story in the Wall Street Journal.
For long time observers of the gold price and the fundamental and not-so-fundamental influences on its price movements, the announcement might have elicited a gasp of delight in the spirit of “It’s about time!”
No such excitement or relief will be long-lived, however. According to the Wall Street Journal piece, “The CFTC is looking at issues including whether the setting of prices for gold—and the smaller silver market—is transparent.”
Gold and Silver Spot Price
They’re referring to the process whereby twice daily, in the case of gold, and once daily, in the case of silver, the spot prices for those metals is set by teleconference by representatives from each of five banks: Barclays, Deutsche Bank AG, , HSBC Holdings, Bank of Nova Scotia, andSociété Générale. The silver pricing involves Bank of Nova Scotia, Deutsche Bank and HSBC.
While that process may indeed be compromised in terms of legitimacy to some degree (what process involving a major financial institution is not?), barring the revelation of large scale collusion and outright arbitrary price setting, it is not expected to unveil any major irregularities. That’s because the manipulation of the prices for precious metals is not a case of overt nominal manipulation. The prices set by the participants in the daily teleconferences is set by an examination of the existing orders to buy physical gold, versus orders to sell. More sellers than buyers, the price goes down, and vice versa.
The whole exercise is an opportunity for the perception management team at the banks to prove that, “Hey! See? The spot price of gold isn’t manipulated!” Well nobody is pointing to the setting of the spot price and saying that it has ever been manipulated. That’s a Red Herring of the first order, and this whole charade will be nothing more than a PR stunt that will feed media and justify mainstream media skepticism for years to come.
Futures Market Needs to be Regulated
It is the persistent unlimited origination of contracts for both gold and silver in the futures market for future purchase and sale of gold and silver many times the possible global supply that constitutes manipulation, in that they influence the demand for physical gold and silver by signaling future price direction. Which is contrary to the original function of futures markets, which was to provide a framework whereby banks could determine how much to lend a farmer for seed and equipment in the spring by estimating the price for the crops he would sow when harvested in the fall.
The mechanism was maintained as a future price discovery tool by the existence of limits on the amount of commodity that could be traded in the future market based on what the total possible future market supply could be. Futures markets in wheat, for example, pre-empted by regulation any end-user, or buyer from issuing contracts to sell or to buy more wheat than could be produced in a given year.
Historically, the futures contract price for wheat was determined, simplistically, by a model that incorporated total world demand for wheat at time of sale versus total world availability of wheat relative to the cash price for wheat now. The participants were the farmer (supply) and the bank (financier), as well as the baker (demand). The financier’s role was limited to figuring out how much to safely lend the farmer, and also how much he could back the baker’s commitment to future delivery of wheat a set price. These were culturally governed roles where the interests of all participants was aligned toward mitigating loss and maximizing profit by offsetting risk.
As the futures exchanges evolved, and banking became more of a predatory profession as opposed to a facilitative one, the futures contracts themselves have become the objects of a gambling casino, and one where the house is the banks, as they originate and “roll over”, or negotiate a new contract sale or purchase instead of making good on a failed transaction. The commodities exchanges became gambling houses, where punters could buy and sell contracts without any intention of actually delivering or taking delivery.
The modern gambling hall is NYMEX and COMEX, where, with the cooperation of the CFTC and other government regulators, the rules governing the establishment and sale of futures contracts have been stripped down to the point where, today, futures contracts are originated with no requirement to reflect the actual supply and demand of any given commodity. They create the supply in paper form, and collude with each other to roll over contracts and swap losses in various further derivative instruments, and the net effect is a complex system of wagering and hedging that lets the banks drive spot commodity demand by generating as much paper supply as they require. Purchasers of the physical commodity are thus induced into selling, or refraining to buy, gold, silver, oil and any other commodity such a racket can be set up around.
This probe is meaningless, and a mere publicity stunt.
Bart Chilton Strikes Again
The idea was put forward by CFTC commissioner Bart Chilton, who said, “The idea that pervasive manipulation, or attempted manipulation is so widespread, it should make us all query the veracity of the other key marks. What about energy, swaps, the gold and silver fixes in London and the whole litany of ‘bors’?” he said, referring to Libor, Euribor and other benchmarks.
Bart’s last investigation into specific irregularities in silver trading, announced in 2008, was never formally concluded and no results have ever been announced. It appears to have been quietly swept under the rug, as the New York Times requests for comments were not responded to.
Until the regulatory deficiencies that permit exponentially excessive contract volume in futures and forwards, collusion among the major market participants, and no limit on positions by speculators are addressed, all of the misguided and sham investigations the CFTC can muster will have the same predictable outcome – business as usual for the futures markets participants who inflate, confound, and thus manipulate the prices of gold, silver and every other commodity they choose.
Midas Letter is the Journal of Investment Strategy of the Midas Letter Opportunity Fund, a Luxembourg-based Special Investment Fund that specializes in Canadian-listed emerging companies in the resource sector with a focus on precious metals explorers and miners. James West is the Portfolio and Investment Advisor to the fund.
Every month, James West’s MidasLetter Premium Edition deconstructs the economic and political events of the past and upcoming week, and identifies risks and opportunities to investors seeking to profit while the majority of investors are losing money.
With a track record extending back 10 years in precious metals-related assets, Midas Letter provides actionable, accurate, and un-biased information every week that saves subscribers losses from exposure to mis-identified trends, and directs them to high performance investments.